Questions about KittyKind’s newletter set off a nasty response. KK originally wrote: “The TNR (trap, neuter, release) initiative has allowed feral cats to remain in a familiar environment without multiplying, but a resolution for rescued cats with behavior issues is more problematic.”
Question: Are you implying that kittykind is active in TNR?
Someone Answered: HERE IS NO SUCH IMPLICATION – They are saying that TNR intitiatives go so far. There also needs to be a way to handle cats that cannot be released who have behavior issues.
Response: Then If TNR is not what they’re writing about, perhaps it shouldn’t be included in their prelude to their article. Perhaps they needed to be clear that “it is an issue as to how to help rescued cats with behaviour issues that likely are not adoptable or cannot easliy find homes”. . . this is more clearly talking about KittyKind’s topic of “a way to handle cats that cannot be released who have behavior issues.” TNR has nothing to do with the programs referred to in this non specific way.
Question: are you saying that kittykind has a problem with rescued cats with behavior issues in general?
Someone Answered: WHERE ON EARTH DO YOU GET THIS FROM. They are saying that it is an issue as to how to help rescued cats with behaviour issues that likely are not adoptable or cannot easliy find homes.
Response: That’s not what they posted: “a resolution for rescued cats with behavior issues is more problematic.”
2. There are limited quality homes and sanctuaries and most are at capacity.
Question: What is capacity?
Answer: ARE YOU A REALLY THAT CLUELESS AS TO THINK THAT THERE IS LOTS OF ROOM IN SANCTUARIES AT THE MOMENT> — they are saying that there is no room in sanctuaries and good foster homes are maxed out. Do you know of openings in sanctuaries at the moment — please share that with us oh wise one. Capacity meaning the sanctuaries say they cannot accept anymore cats. Capacity in a foster home depends on the amount of room and number of cats in residence. No pat answer to this as any fool would knowl.
Response: The question was really about how much is considered capacity in foster homes. So your answer that it depends on the amount of room and number of cats in residence is not a definitive answer. However, any fool would know that it is unreasonable to expect a foster home to take in more than a certain amount of cats especially when there are other cats in residence. So, it appears from your answer that there’s no policy on how many cats can be fostered in one home?
3. Nevertheless, KK has responded to this dilemma by developing a permanent, long-term care program for our unadoptable cats.
Question: What is that program? Can you be more specific? This sounds very vague.
Response: So ask for specifics about the program if you want to donate money. Most people with common sense do not just hand over money if they have questions. You are implying they are being deliberately vague. If you want to know, just ask..
Answer: You have said that I lack comprehension of English – What you said is definite and your feelings are clearly projected. I just asked for specifics about a program that is not defined. Perhaps you would prefer to my rephrasing my thought to be more comprehensible you: “Saying that they have a program seems to be very general – can you be more specific about the elements in that program?”
4. Your contribution is most needed this year as the cost of maintaining this program rose dramatically due to the escalation of commodity prices such as food and fuel.
Question: How long has this “program” been in effect?
Response: Reasonable questionl at last a reasonable question.
Answer: And what is the answer to this reasonable question?
5. We greatly appreciate contributions made specifically to this program.”
Question: To what specific program should donations be addressed?
Response: TO THE PROGRAM THEY HAVE JUST DESCRIBED. Can you not read English.
Answer: The program was never described. No answer was given, again no clarity.
Question: Will people making donations receive answers to these questions?
Response: NOT EVERYONE READING THIS HAS AS MANY PROBLEMS WITH SIMPLE COMPREHENSION AS YOU OBVIOUSLY DO.
Finally I Questioned: Is this KittyKind’s response? In NYS there are guidelines about transparency according to the Attorney General’s office and the Charities Bureau. Holding a donation over your heads should not be a reason for answering clearly – These policies and procedures should be available for everyone. Maybe to date no one has asked these questions but they’re being asked now. Do you have no answers? There is no danger in honestly answering these questions, these are specifics that everyone would appreciate knowing. The more transparency, the more trust – it is something Public Charities are encouraged to do.
Their response was: if you want to find fault at least ask reasonable questions that are not addressed… you are just looking for stuff. The only real question you may have is can you let me know how this programs works and how long has it been around. Simple question. Now cut and paste and sent them an email like a good girl. Have you asked these questions or are you posting them hoping someone will respond… Easier to just send them an email. That is what normal people would do.
“if you want to find fault”?!! “ask reasonable questions”?!!
I’m looking for answers to these already reasonable questions! Maybe others are interested too but now you include what questions I may ask and what is reasonable and how it is easier to send them an email? Easier for who?
Are you a representative of KittyKind? Did they give you permission to answer for them?
Your response is a great disservice to them.